Thank you to everyone who joined the discussion regarding the proposed Immigration Place monument between 2 May and 14 June 2012. The consultation report is now available at the bottom of this page.
Celebrate the contribution of immigrants to Australia’s past, present and future. Immigrants have played a central role in the political, social and economic life of Australia since 1788, and we want to celebrate the ways they have enriched our community and culture.
Immigration Place Australia (IPA) is an incorporated not-for-profit organisation. Click here for more information on IPA. [External Link]
The consultation is now closed. Further information on the consultation, including the Have Your Say comments on proposed site, design and commemorative intent can be found below.
Previous Approvals
The Canberra National Memorials Committee (CNMC) has approved a site adjacent to East Block (National Archives of Australia) in the Parliamentary Zone for the development of an Immigration Monument.
Caption: The approved site of Immigration Place
Current Proposal
IPA's vision is to create a significant national monument, called Immigration Place, within Canberra’s Parliamentary Zone, close to the other landmark sites and buildings which speak of Australia’s past and future.
Immigration Place will become a place for all Australians to meet and reflect on our immigrant past and the contribution migrants have made to the diversity, significance, culture and changing values of Australia. It will also actively engage visitors, encouraging them to search for, and locate their names, those of family and friends and read the many stories of migration.
The NCA has already advised IPA that the design of Immigration Place must:
- respect and complement the existing landscape, built environment and context of the area; and
- take careful account of all heritage values of the area. These include, but are not limited to, those set out in the Parliament House Vista Heritage Management Plan.
Community Comment
IPA are required to obtain CNMC approval of their design brief before conducting a design competition.
IPA are asking the community to help identify important issues to be considered and addressed in preparing the design brief.
Comments are now closed.
Next steps
The NCA will prepare a report on the public consultation. The report will be provided to IPA to guide the development of a design brief for use in a future design competition. The consultation report will also be published on this website and will be provided to the CNMC as part of any advice from the NCA.
The CNMC will be asked to approve the design brief and the conduct of a design competition. IPA expects to seek this approval in the second half of 2012.
At completion of the design competition, the NCA will:
- undertake or commission an assessment of the heritage impact of the winning design. The assessment will consider all known heritage values associated with the site. This will include, but not be limited to, assessment against the formal heritage values of the Parliament House Vista (included on the Commonwealth Heritage List). The heritage assessment will be provided to the CNMC as part of any advice from the NCA; and
- undertake or commission an assessment of the feasibility and cost of constructing Immigration Place and provide that assessment to the CNMC as part of any advice from the NCA.
The CNMC will make the final decision about the design/character of Immigration Place. The timing of any such consideration is dependent on the completion of the above assessments. It is likely that the CNMC would be asked to consider this matter early in 2013. The NCA is not currently represented in the membership of the CNMC. The NCA will serve the CNMC in a secretariat and advisory capacity only.






Comments
I’d like to see Immigration Place develop as a place where children can learn about their migrant heritage. The range of new technology available is immense and there may be opportunities to incorporate some innovative and exciting options within this landscape project.
It would also be great to have an area suitable for small-scale citizenship ceremonies.
As the Chair I would greatly appreciate contact from you to me as I am feeling rather sidelined.
After sending monies initially to Immigration bridge - I sent further message re needing to re phrase my wording Never received a response.
In the end I thought I had done my money.
Have received several notifications since but was never able to respond as address not given and no email reply was provided for.
Or am I mistaken and is this a different project from the Immigration Bridge??
Thanks
Willi Carney ( Ms)
Too late to get my 1960 ten-Pounds back!
Joel
Immigration Place should symbolise the spirit and benefits of migration to this nation.
It should also be a place for people to reunite, either physically or through the sharing of stories of migration.
I think it is important to complement and support the role of the National Archives of Australia as the official repository of so many migrant records.
My hope is, that area now selected is NOT HARD TO FIND.
Immigration is what Australia is all about. It should be very visual and accorded the recognition it so richly deserves.
MUST be careful not to get caught up in architectural design that defeats the purpose of what the IMMIGRATION STORY is all about.
Like those going to ANZAC cove - this area should be just as meaningful - VISITATION MUST BE EASILY ACCESSED, NAMES EASY TO READ, AND LONGLASTING AND WEATHER PROOF MATERIALS used.
An excellent interpretive/information centre should be alongside with access to family histories.
The whole Immigration story should be accessible on the ONE SITE.
Should be a fantastic educational facility.
(C) After reading about the immigrants & their stories, I think this will give the public good incentive to trace their family histories.
On another note: I too, like other commentators, was beginning to wonder when my monies & my family stories would be actioned to a physical construction date by email updates becoming frequent
I feel when this project is finalised & on show for all to view. This will be great benefit to our future generations & something we all should be proud of, which includes & acknowledges the "First Indigenous Australians" with their contributions.
As you walk you pass through decades of time however you start the walk on the bank of centuries of indigenous lands.
Now the fun bit. Lets say a culture = a colour. English are blue, Italian red, dutch orange etc.
There are enough hues of colour to represent all the cultures that have come to Australia. Lots of blues (English) and green (Irish), and several other colours for other cultures. Blue dominates from 1788 to 1930, but much is 'infused'. Then more colours infuse. You can watch for a colour and study it and see real names and hidden stories. By the end (2013) many colours have intertwined and some remain distinct and some are even new.
I would like to see some physical evidence of my contribution so that in years to come my children and grand children will be able to trace my migration journey.
In a similar vein, it was concerning to hear of the proposal to add more Memorials outside the magnificient War Memorial when the tretreat ceremony was at one time under threat due to a lack of funds. The same would be true with the Archives ... it would be terrible to see a too elaborate and expensive (to maintain) memorial erected outside the Archives, and then have the ongoing budget for the Archives itself later come under pressure.
An accessable building with displays, and interactive database access would be far more practical, and provide a great resource for schools and visitors as well as relatives keen to check their ancestor's stories.
A name on a wall does not provide a huge experience.
It should complement what is in the Archives next door but also access their databases.
However, we are ALL immigrants here - not just those most recently arrived. Even aboriginal peoples were immigrants in prehistoric times.
The listing of names on a paid basis is inappropriate and divisive - the site should commemorate all immigrants of all generations, not just the few subscribers.
A discreet panel somewhere listing the original few subscribers to the bridge project should close the door on that regrettable misfire.
Immigrants are not automatically heroes. We all came here for our own benefit and most of us owe more to the country than we have given to it. This should be a monument of gratitude for the rare opportunities this land has offered us, not a claim to some fake heroic status that can be bought by a subscription.
be in the shape of a number of maze like rotundas, inside each other ,
in order to accommodate the countless countries from which migrants arrived. Countries should be featured in alphabetical order , with a background mural depicting e.g. national attire or a significant landmark identifying the individual country . All migrants who arrived down under should be listed alphabetically as from a certain cut-off date on an electronic data base and access to the data should be by way of individual computer terminals under each country. The Immigration Bridge memorial as a monument to migrants will then also serve as a most useful research repository.
Engraving all migrant names on a wall or bridge railing would be a physical impossibility and also discriminatory, if open only to those of us who registered originally,.
Dr. W. Frick, Thornlie, WA 6108
I approve of the site near the National Archives. I trust that the migrant stories that have been contributed will be available at the archives building if not incorporated into the monument design.
There can be no better place for a tangible and conspicuous symbol to be placed than in Canberra, our national capital.
Jim D
It will also be a resource for historical research since it will contain the records of many "ordinary" people whose stories will not be available elsewhere. As an example, the Jugiong Catholic Church was celebrating its 100th or 150th anniversary a few years ago and was able to invite me because the records of the Memorial showed that the first burial in the Catholic section of the Jugiong Ceremetery was my great-great-grandfather.
Remember $100 was paid in good faith for 'names on a bridge'. These names MUST be displayed clearly, permanently and easily accessible. e.g a rail if not a bridge.
Lawn cemeteries have enduring plaques - ask them.
All immigrant names are available at Archive. Therefore no discrimination
Technology can provide a continuous, rolling display of the contributed stories. ( how wonderful they all are)
Please hurry up Lottie is 93
Richard Lawson, Nimmitabel NSW 2631
James Robertson
Motherwell, Scotland for ever!
Victor Rebikoff OAM
One assumes it will be done with taste, respect and in keeping with all monuments in the Capital, so why is there more delay by being open to community consultation?
One cannot be blamed for being a touch cynical after all this while.
Please note, this is first opportunity of communicating I have been afforded.